Managers: 7 Admin Settings to Lock for Timesheet Approvals

Timesheet approvals are the formal step where a manager reviews and verifies an employee’s logged hours before that data becomes final for payroll. If you manage a team, your immediate priority is simple: confirm who your approvers are, set a firm submission deadline, and make sure approved records lock automatically before payroll runs. Get those three things right, and you gain accurate payroll and a clean audit trail.

---

TL;DR:

• Only approved and locked timesheets should be exported to payroll to prevent paying for hours that have not been verified.
• Setting clear approval periods, deadlines, and automated reminders helps ensure timely submissions and prevent delays impacting payroll.
• Approvers must never be the employees themselves and should be assigned at various levels like user, team, or project to maintain control.
• Reopen requests should be used for corrections, with all changes documented and logged to preserve audit integrity and compliance.
• Automated approval workflows, fallback approvers, and period locking reduce manual errors and streamline the entire timesheet approval process.

---

Table of Contents

• What Is a Timesheet Approval and Why Does It Matter?
• Who Approves Timesheets, and Who Should Never Be Allowed To?
• How Does the Timesheet Approval Workflow Actually Work?
• How Do You Set Up Timesheet Approvals as an Admin?
• What Are the Best Practices for a Smooth Approval Process?
• What Should You Do When a Timesheet Approval Goes Wrong?
• How Do Employees Submit a Timesheet for Approval?
• How Do You Export Approved Timesheets for Payroll?
• How Does Timesheet Approval Fit Into Project Management and Billing?
• What Happens When You Need to Edit an Approved Timesheet?
• Author Mark’s Perspective: What Actually Breaks in Real Deployments
• How AYYES Makes Timesheet Approvals Run on Autopilot
• Sources
• FAQ

What Is a Timesheet Approval and Why Does It Matter?

A timesheet approval is the checkpoint where a supervisor confirms recorded hours are accurate, then locks that record so it can’t be quietly edited afterward. Once approved, the timesheet becomes the official version of events for payroll, billing, and compliance purposes. That locking behavior matters more than most managers realize; it’s what turns a spreadsheet of hours into a defensible business record.

The payoff shows up in fewer payroll corrections, a clearer paper trail if a wage dispute ever surfaces, and a payroll run that doesn’t blow past its deadline because someone forgot to log Friday’s hours. The Department of Labor’s recordkeeping guidance makes clear that employers carry responsibility for keeping accurate time records, and an approval workflow is the practical mechanism that satisfies it.

Cadence depends on your pay cycle. Weekly approvals suit hourly teams and businesses running weekly payroll, since errors get caught while memories are fresh. Monthly approvals work better for salaried teams tracking time for project billing rather than wage calculation, where the stakes of a one-day delay are lower.

Who Approves Timesheets, and Who Should Never Be Allowed To?

Most organizations route approvals through a direct manager. That’s the person closest to the work and best positioned to spot an entry that doesn’t match the schedule. Larger organizations often add layers: a project manager signs off on task-level accuracy, and HR or finance gives the final approval before the numbers hit payroll.

One rule has no exceptions worth making: nobody approves their own timesheet. Self-approval defeats the entire purpose of the control and creates an obvious compliance gap if you’re ever audited. Enforce it at the system level, not just in policy, by restricting approval permissions so an employee’s own submissions never appear in their own queue.

Approval routing typically works at a few different scopes:

• User-level routing, where each employee has one assigned approver, usually their direct manager.
• Team-level routing, where a team lead approves for everyone on their roster.
• Project-level routing, where a project manager approves hours logged against their specific project, regardless of who submitted them.
• Fallback approvers, who step in automatically when the primary approver is out, so nothing sits stalled in a queue for a week.

How Does the Timesheet Approval Workflow Actually Work?

A timesheet moves through a predictable sequence of statuses, and knowing what each one means keeps everyone’s expectations aligned.

1. Submitted. The employee finalizes their hours for the period and sends them forward. The record is visible but not yet official.
2. Under review. The assigned approver checks entries against schedules, project codes, or overtime rules.
3. Changes requested. If something doesn’t add up, the approver kicks it back with a note explaining what needs fixing.
4. Resubmitted. The employee corrects the entry and sends it forward again.
5. Approved. The approver signs off, and the record locks.
6. Locked. The timesheet is now the official record. Further edits require a formal reopen process.

Multi-level approval chains add a wrinkle: a timesheet might need sign-off from both a project manager and HR before it’s truly final, and it stays in a pending state until every required approver has acted. Fallback rules matter here too. If an approver is on leave and doesn’t act within a set window, the system should automatically route the request to a backup rather than let it sit.

The integration rule that ties this together: only approved, locked timesheets should ever export to payroll. Pulling from anything still marked “submitted” or “under review” risks paying someone for hours nobody actually verified, which is exactly the kind of error payroll process documentation warns against when mapping time records into a payroll run.

How Do You Set Up Timesheet Approvals as an Admin?

Configuration is where most approval breakdowns actually start, not in the review step itself. A handful of settings determine whether your workflow runs smoothly or generates a pile of late submissions every pay period.

1. Define the approval period. Match it to your pay cycle: weekly, biweekly, or monthly.
2. Set a submission deadline. Give employees a firm cutoff, typically the last working day of the period.
3. Configure reminder notifications. Automated nudges at 48 hours, 24 hours, and the morning of the deadline cut down on chasing people manually.
4. Assign approvers by scope. Map each employee, team, or project to the right approver based on your routing model.
5. Set fallback and out-of-office rules. Designate a backup approver so a manager’s vacation doesn’t stall an entire team’s payroll.
6. Enable period locking. Once approved, the period should lock automatically, with edits only possible through a formal reopen request.
7. Turn on audit logging. Every submission, edit, rejection, and approval should generate a timestamped log entry.

The deadline question comes up constantly, and guidance on payroll date management points to a workable standard: build in at least two business days between the approval deadline and the actual payroll run. That buffer gives you room to chase a straggler or fix a flagged entry without pushing pay day.

Pro Tip: Set your reminder cadence to escalate, not just repeat. A gentle nudge at 48 hours, a firmer one at 24 hours, and a direct message to the employee’s manager on deadline day gets far better compliance than three identical emails.

What Are the Best Practices for a Smooth Approval Process?

The biggest failure mode in timesheet approval isn’t a broken workflow. It’s a manager who clicks “approve” on autopilot without actually checking the entries. Rubber-stamping defeats the entire purpose of having a review step, and it’s more common than most HR teams want to admit.

A few habits keep the process honest:

• Standardize a short review checklist: hours match the schedule, overtime is flagged, project codes are correct, no duplicate entries.
• Run periodic spot-checks, comparing a sample of approved timesheets against calendar invites or project logs each quarter.
• Automate reminders rather than relying on managers to remember deadlines manually.
• Retain approved records and any correction logs for as long as your jurisdiction’s recordkeeping rules require.

That last point isn’t optional housekeeping. The Department of Labor’s recordkeeping guidance treats accurate, retained time records as a core employer obligation, and a correction log shows exactly what changed and who authorized it if a record is ever questioned.

Pro Tip: Build your spot-check cadence around risk, not calendar convenience. Review overtime-heavy weeks and any timesheet with a same-day correction more closely than a routine 40-hour week that matches the schedule exactly.

What Should You Do When a Timesheet Approval Goes Wrong?

Most approval problems fall into a short list: a missed deadline, an approver who’s unavailable, or an error discovered after the record already locked. Diagnose the issue before reacting; a stuck approval often traces back to a fallback approver who was never assigned in the first place.

When a correction is genuinely needed after approval:

• Submit a formal reopen request rather than editing the record directly, if your system allows direct edits at all.
• Document the reason for the correction in a note attached to the record, not in a side email that won’t survive an audit.
• Re-export only the corrected period to payroll, avoiding a full re-run that risks touching unrelated records.
• Loop in HR or finance for anything involving pay rate changes, retroactive overtime, or a dispute the employee has raised formally.

Every reopen and edit should generate its own timestamped log entry, preserving the original approval alongside the correction.

How Do Employees Submit a Timesheet for Approval?

From the employee’s side, the process should feel almost mechanical: log hours, review them, submit, done. Most delays in the approval pipeline don’t originate with approvers dragging their feet. They start with employees who submit late, submit incomplete entries, or don’t submit at all until someone chases them.

A clean submission flow works like this. The employee logs hours daily or fills in the full period before the deadline, ideally with time entries tied to specific projects or tasks rather than a single undifferentiated block. Before hitting submit, they review the entries for the period: missed days, mismatched project codes, and overtime that needs a note explaining why it happened. Once satisfied, they submit, and the record moves into the “under review” status where it becomes visible to their assigned approver.

A few habits make this smoother for everyone downstream. Daily logging beats end-of-period reconstruction, since nobody remembers exactly what they worked on eleven days ago. Attaching a brief note to any unusual entry, like a late night that pushed someone into overtime, gives the approver context instead of forcing them to ask. And treating the submission deadline as fixed, not a soft suggestion, keeps the whole downstream chain, review, correction, approval, locking, on schedule.

Tools that combine time tracking with automatic timestamping remove a lot of friction here, since employees aren’t reconstructing hours from memory at the end of the week. That’s the difference between a submission process that runs itself and one that generates a stream of “can you resend your hours” messages every payday.

How Do You Export Approved Timesheets for Payroll?

Only locked, fully approved records should ever reach payroll. That single rule prevents the most common and costly timesheet error: paying someone based on hours nobody actually verified.

The mechanics are straightforward once the approval workflow is solid. Approved timesheets for the pay period get filtered by status, exported in a format your payroll system or provider accepts, and cross-checked against the total headcount before the payroll run executes. Any timesheet still sitting in “submitted” or “under review” status gets flagged and excluded, with a note to the manager that payroll can’t proceed on that person’s hours until approval clears.

Guidance on automating payroll processing points to a practical benefit here: when your export rule only pulls approved-and-locked records, you eliminate the manual filtering step where someone on the payroll team has to eyeball a spreadsheet and guess which entries are final. That manual filtering is where a lot of payroll errors originate, not in the time entry itself but in someone accidentally including a timesheet that was still pending changes.

Timing matters as much as the mechanics. If your export happens the same day payroll processes, you have zero room to catch a last-minute problem. Building in the two-business-day buffer mentioned earlier gives you a window to resolve a flagged export before it becomes a missed payroll deadline. For businesses running payroll through a third-party provider, confirm the exact file format and field mapping they require well before your first live export, since a mismatched project code or missing employee ID can bounce an entire batch back for manual correction.

How Does Timesheet Approval Fit Into Project Management and Billing?

Approved timesheets don’t just feed payroll. For agencies, consultancies, and any business billing clients by the hour, that same locked record is the source of truth for invoicing, and treating it as anything less invites disputes.

The connection works best when project management and time tracking share the same underlying data rather than living in separate systems that require manual reconciliation. When a timesheet is approved, the hours attached to a specific project or task code should flow directly into that project’s budget tracking, letting a project manager see actual hours against estimated hours without exporting a spreadsheet and rebuilding it by hand.

For client billing, the logic is identical to the payroll rule: only approved, locked hours should ever appear on an invoice. An unapproved entry that later gets corrected or rejected, if it’s already been billed to a client, creates a credit-and-rebill headache that damages trust far more than a slightly late invoice would. Locking the approval before the billing cycle starts avoids that entirely.

This is also where task-level or project-level approval routing earns its keep. A project manager who approves hours against their own budget catches a miscoded entry, like a subcontractor’s time logged against the wrong client, long before it reaches an invoice. That’s a different failure mode than a payroll error, but it’s just as costly, and it’s preventable with the same discipline: route approval to the person closest to the work, and don’t let unapproved hours move downstream into billing or budgeting decisions.

What Happens When You Need to Edit an Approved Timesheet?

Locked doesn’t mean permanently unchangeable. It means changes require a deliberate, documented process instead of a quiet edit that erases what actually happened. That distinction is what keeps an approved timesheet usable as an audit record.

The most common exceptions are predictable: a manager approved a timesheet before noticing a missed overtime entry, an employee logged hours against the wrong project code, or a payroll error surfaced weeks later during a routine audit. In every case, the fix follows the same shape. Someone with reopen authority, usually the original approver, HR, or a system admin, unlocks the specific record rather than the entire pay period. The correction gets made, with a note explaining what changed and why. The record gets re-approved, generating a new timestamp and log entry that sits alongside the original approval rather than replacing it.

That paired record, original approval plus correction log, is exactly what auditors and DOL investigators look for when reviewing recordkeeping compliance. A system that lets you silently overwrite an approved entry, with no trace of the original, creates far more legal exposure than an occasional correction handled transparently.

The threshold for who can authorize a reopen matters too. Routine corrections, like a typo in a project code, can often sit with the direct manager. Anything touching pay rate, overtime calculation, or a retroactive change spanning multiple pay periods should route to HR or finance, since those changes carry compliance weight beyond the individual timesheet.

Author Mark’s Perspective: What Actually Breaks in Real Deployments

The failure I see most often isn’t a broken workflow. It’s managers treating approval as a rubber stamp, which erases the entire point of the control. Two quick wins fix most of it: enforce a fallback approver on day one, and require a written reason for every “changes requested” click.

AYYES was built around this exact discipline, an approval inbox with routing, reminders, and locked periods baked in rather than bolted on. Whatever platform you use, pick one organization-wide policy and stop letting individual managers freelance their own rules.

— Mark

How AYYES Makes Timesheet Approvals Run on Autopilot

Ayyes is the practical alternative to chasing approvals through spreadsheets and email threads. Every pattern covered above, approver routing, fallback assignment, deadline reminders, period locking, and audit logs, is built directly into the platform rather than something you assemble from scattered tools.

Managers get a single approval inbox instead of a dozen scattered submission emails. Reminders fire automatically as deadlines approach, fallback approvers step in the moment someone’s out of office, and once a period locks, the record stays locked until someone with the right permission formally reopens it, with every action logged and timestamped. That locked, approved data is also what flows into invoicing and project budgets, so the same record you trust for payroll is the one you trust for client billing. Alongside its own approval engine, Ayyes covers the practical documentation side too, mapping cleanly into the kind of payroll process documentation your finance team needs for a clean export. If your current process still runs on manual sign-off and hope, start a free trial with Ayyes and see what a locked, auditable approval queue looks like on your very next payroll run.

Sources

For the legal side of recordkeeping, the Department of Labor’s Fact Sheet 21 lays out federal requirements for maintaining accurate time records. For the operational side, payroll date management guidance and current small-business payroll statistics offer useful context on why approval discipline pays off.

This article is general information, not a substitute for advice from a qualified financial advisor. Consult a qualified financial professional about your own circumstances before acting on anything here.

• U.S. Department of Labor — Recordkeeping requirements (FLSA) — Fact Sheet 21
• Glendale Payroll — Payroll process documentation

FAQ

What Is Timesheet Approval?

Timesheet approval is the process where a manager or supervisor reviews an employee’s recorded hours and confirms their accuracy before the data locks and becomes final for payroll or billing.

Who Approves My Timesheet?

Typically your direct manager approves your timesheet, though larger organizations may add a project manager for task-level review and HR or finance for final payroll sign-off. Nobody, at any level, should be able to approve their own hours.

How Long Does It Take for a Timesheet to Be Approved?

There’s no fixed universal timeline, but organizations generally expect approval within a few business days of submission to allow sufficient buffer before the payroll cutoff. Platforms like Ayyes speed this up with automated reminders that push approvers before the deadline slips.

What Is an Approved Timesheet?

An approved timesheet is a locked, verified record of hours worked that can’t be edited without a formal reopen request, making it the official source of truth for payroll, billing, and compliance audits.